Web13 May 2024 · Cited – Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan HL 24-Jun-1940 Occupier Responsible for Nuisance in adopting it A trespasser laid a drain along a ditch on the defendant’s land. Later the defendants came to use the drain themselves. A grate was misplaced by them so that in a heavy rainstorm, it became clogged with leaves, and water … WebIn Sedleigh-Denfield v. O'Callaghan [1940] A.C. 880, Lord Wright said: "I do not attempt any exhaustive definition of that cause of action. But it has never lost its essential character …
[Case Law Tort] [
Web*Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan [1940] AC 880. Compare *Hussain v Lancaster City C [1999] 2 WLR 1142 with Lippiatt v South Gloucs. CC [1999] 3 WLR 137 ... Wringe v Cohen … WebSedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan [1940] UKHL 2 – Law Journals Indices Account / Login Case: Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan [1940] UKHL 2 Flood Liability: Don’t be a nuisance … body basic corona ca
Sedleigh-Denfield v O
WebSEDLEIGH-DENFIELD (Pauper) V. ViscountMaugham LordAtkin LordWright LordRomer LordPorter O'CALLAGHAN AND OTHERS Viscount Maugham MY LORDS, This is an appeal … WebAt a general level, the law of private nuisance is concerned with maintaining a balance between the conflicting rights of neighbouring landowners - “between the right of the occupier to do what he likes with his own, and the right of his neighbour not to be interfered with”: Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan [1940] AC 880, 903 (Lord Wright ... WebThe leading case is of course Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan [1940] AC 880, in which the potential source of the nuisance was created by a trespasser. Attempts to distinguish … body basic