WebSee Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004). Particularity: The warrant should describe the place to be searched with particularity. See United States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90 (2006). Signed by a “neutral and detached” magistrate or judge. See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971). Execution of Warrants WebCoolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 464–71 (1971). 2 In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 17–19, (1968), the Court wrote: “This Court has held in the past that a search which is reasonable at its inception may violate the Fourth Amendment by virtue of its intolerable intensity and scope. Kremen v.
GERSTEIN v. PUGH, 420 U.S. 103 (1975) FindLaw
WebWhen the police applied for a warrant to search suspect Edward Coolidge’s automobile, the Attorney General, acting as a justice of the peace, authorized it. Additionally, … WebEdward H. Coolidge, Jr.'s, conviction by a New Hampshire Court was overturned on appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. AC argued the case for the Petitioner … havilah ravula
Coolidge v. New Hampshire/Concurrence Harlan - Wikisource
WebAbstract. THIS ARTICLE EXAMINES THE PLAIN VIEW DOCTRINE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE COOLIDGE V. NEW HAMPSHIRE CASE. IT FOCUSES ON TWO REQUIREMENTS FOR A VALID PLAIN VIEW SEIZURE: (1) THE DISCOVERY OF THE ITEM MUST BE 'INADVERTANT'; AND (2) THE ITEM TO BE SEIZED MUST BE … WebOct 31, 2012 · Q: What is the procedural history of the case Coolidge v. New Hampshire and how did it get to the Supreme Court? Related Topics: Constitutional Law 1 Lawyer … WebKatz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347, 389 U. S. 357; Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 403 U. S. 454 455; Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U. S. 42, 399 U. S. 1. It is equally well settled that one of the specifically established exceptions to the requirements of both a warrant and probable cause is a search that is conducted pursuant to consent. havilah seguros